On 8/11/06, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose that Velocity step out from the Jakarta > umbrella and become a TLP at Apache. IMHO not the Velocity's position in the Apache tree is the problem, but the time invested by it's commiters. A SVN history can do everyone to see that.
Hmm. Well, that's not really the problem that we're trying to solve with this proposed move. But, since you mention it, one of my main reasons for supporting this move is that it will allow us to make closer connections between Velocity-based projects and thus grow the immediate community. This may both 1) create renewed interest in past and current committers and contributers via more exposure to new, interesting Velocity-based projects (like Click) and/or 2) make it easier to bring in new committers and contributers for Velocity from those projects' communities. Of course, there are no guarantees, but when i combine the above with the fact that much of VelocityTools really doesn't fit with the direction Jakarta is heading--obstructing the desired path for both Jakarta and VelocityTools--then it seems very clear to me that this effort is worth some time on my part in the near future.
So my vote (even if it doesn't count) would be -1 for a move.
:(
Better invest that very small time that you have for Velocity and bring out finally the 1.5 release. Many were expecting it last year's autumn and now have the fear that it won't be out not even this year's autumn.
In contrast to my reasons above, it has been exceedingly hard to motivate myself (much less others, either contributers or committers) to hunt down and fix the remaining known bugs in 1.5-dev, since most are obscure, difficult to fix and already were present in the previous official releases. Many were even reported prior to those previous releases. Further, i'll admit that i've become increasingly comfortable using the unreleased 1.5-dev, having no personal policy against it and not currently needing it for my employer. I suspect the same is true of the other committers and many key contributers. This also affects how i prioritize the time i have to spend on Velocity stuff. All that said, I won't ask that you agree with my choice to spend time on this proposal prior to working on the bugs we wish to swat before releasing 1.5 (or even just releasing it as is), but considering that i've already decided this is where i wish to put my little time in the next month or so, i must ask, is it really the move to TLP that you oppose? Or is it just how i (and others supporting this) have chosen to prioritize our time? I will hear feedback on the latter, but i'd prefer to know what people think of the former, regardless of the latter. :) Thanks!
Thank you, Ahmed. -- Click Framework: http://click.sourceforge.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
