umm, I just proposed it.  I'll be at ApacheCon in October.  I was thinking
we might grab a table, figure out what needs to be done, and spend a day or
two intensively coding and documenting.

WILL


On 8/11/06, Malcolm Edgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I think the TLP will be a good move for Velocity, raising its profile
and getting its development moving again. So for what its worth +1
from me.

I do acknowledge Ahmeds point, as I would love to see the 1.5-dev
released. Its almost a bit unfair for people using 1.4 because its the
production version where 1.5-dev addresses many of its problems.

What is the Velocity Hackathon?

regards Malcolm Edgar

On 8/12/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I won't be at ApacheCon, but i may be able to plan to contribute some
> time during it to participate in a hackathon remotely.
>
> On 8/11/06, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a fan of the TLP idea, though I recognize the validity of Ahmed's
> > concerns.
> >
> > Looking back at the project for a moment... We've got a mature product
with
> > a solid user base, some specific technological action steps we need to
> > take but stalled development.  User support is very good -- the
mailing
> > lists are active with three committers and 5-10 users actively
supporting
> > new users.  The problem is that everyone currently involved has time
for
> > support but not development.
> >
> > Becoming a TLP won't do anything magical for us.  But it'll provide us
with
> > an umbrella to invite other related projects to join Velocity.  (via
the
> > Incubator, of course). Malcolm Edgar's "Click" framework, which has
its own
> > community and is a pretty innovative approach to web development, is
the
> > leading contender.  I think a closer connection with such efforts may
help
> > us revitalize the core development.
> >
> > It'd be nice if we could pair the new TLP organization with a release
of v.
> > 1.5.  Anyone want to join a "Velocity Hackathon" at ApacheCon US in
early
> > October and push this out?
> >
> > WILL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/11/06, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I would like to propose that Velocity step out from the Jakarta
> > > > > umbrella and become a TLP at Apache.
> > > > IMHO not the Velocity's position in the Apache tree is the
problem, but
> > > > the time invested by it's commiters. A SVN history can do everyone
to
> > > see that.
> > >
> > > Hmm.  Well, that's not really the problem that we're trying to solve
> > > with this proposed move.  But, since you mention it, one of my main
> > > reasons for supporting this move is that it will allow us to make
> > > closer connections between Velocity-based projects and thus grow the
> > > immediate community.  This may both 1) create renewed interest in
past
> > > and current committers and contributers via more exposure to new,
> > > interesting Velocity-based projects (like Click) and/or 2) make it
> > > easier to bring in new committers and contributers for Velocity from
> > > those projects' communities.   Of course, there are no guarantees,
but
> > > when i combine the above with the fact that much of VelocityTools
> > > really doesn't fit with the direction Jakarta is
heading--obstructing
> > > the desired path for both Jakarta and VelocityTools--then it seems
> > > very clear to me that this effort is worth some time on my part in
the
> > > near future.
> > >
> > > > So my vote (even if it doesn't count) would be -1 for a move.
> > >
> > > :(
> > >
> > > > Better invest that very small time that you have for Velocity and
bring
> > > out finally the 1.5
> > > > release. Many were expecting it last year's autumn and now have
the fear
> > > that
> > > > it won't be out not even this year's autumn.
> > >
> > > In contrast to my reasons above, it has been exceedingly hard to
> > > motivate myself (much less others, either contributers or
committers)
> > > to hunt down and fix the remaining known bugs in 1.5-dev, since most
> > > are obscure, difficult to fix and already were present in the
previous
> > > official releases.  Many were even reported prior to those previous
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > Further, i'll admit that i've become increasingly comfortable using
> > > the unreleased 1.5-dev, having no personal policy against it and not
> > > currently needing it for my employer.  I suspect the same is true of
> > > the other committers and many key contributers.  This also affects
how
> > > i prioritize the time i have to spend on Velocity stuff.
> > >
> > > All that said, I won't ask that you agree with my choice to spend
time
> > > on this proposal prior to working on the bugs we wish to swat before
> > > releasing 1.5 (or even just releasing it as is), but considering
that
> > > i've already decided this is where i wish to put my little time in
the
> > > next month or so, i must ask, is it really the move to TLP that you
> > > oppose?  Or is it just how i (and others supporting this) have
chosen
> > > to prioritize our time?
> > >
> > > I will hear feedback on the latter, but i'd prefer to know what
people
> > > think of the former, regardless of the latter. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Ahmed.
> > > > -- Click Framework: http://click.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Forio Business Simulations
> >
> > Will Glass-Husain
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > www.forio.com
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Forio Business Simulations

Will Glass-Husain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.forio.com

Reply via email to