Haven’t done any comparisons but we use checkpoint for our big ERP DB (near 6 
TB) backup and still get good compression ratios.   There is nothing that has 
made me think I need to look at it or tweak it to get better.   I’d say the 
benefit of not having to restart a huge backup from scratch offered by 
checkpoints would outweigh deduplication ratio issues unless you have infinite 
time to run backups.






________________________________
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of 
scott.geo...@parker.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:06 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dedupe ratios and checkpoint backups

To answer your question, we tested both the NBU 5000 (Symantec) and the DD860 
(Data Domain) and the differences couldn't be more stark.  I was using a 30 
minute checkpoint interval.  I never achieved anything better than 15:1 from 
the NBU5000 (which isn't bad).  The DD860 hit 39:1 at the time I disabled all 
of the policies.  This was running daily full backups on an array of different 
servers (DB2, Windows file servers, UNIX file servers, and Siebel app servers) 
over the course of 2 months.

The NBU5000 is a fixed block device, the DD860 a variable block device.  There 
is no way of knowing if checkpoints were the culprit for the NBU5000 getting 
the lesser ratio, but it does present a plausible theory.

From:

scott.geo...@parker.com

To:

"veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>

Date:

09/06/2011 02:54 PM

Subject:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Dedupe ratios and checkpoint backups

Sent by:

veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu


________________________________



If at all, this would probably affect fixed-block solutions more than the 
variable-block ones.  The variable-blocked solutions would continue to look for 
identical blocks, but in different positions of the data stream.

From:

"Stafford, Geoff" <gstaff...@barclaycardus.com>

To:

"veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>

Date:

09/06/2011 02:45 PM

Subject:

[Veritas-bu] Dedupe ratios and checkpoint backups

Sent by:

veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu


________________________________



Just wondering if anyone has done testing or seen documentation (from any 
dedupe vendor) regarding the usage of enabling checkpoints on backups that are 
being deduplicated?  I would think that the introduction of checkpoints every X 
minutes into the datastream would interrupt the continuity of the data and make 
it seem more unique thus negatively affecting dedupe ratios but I’m wondering 
by how much.  Most, if not all, of the variable length guys have the ability to 
‘re-align’ themselves to the start of the files so I would think it might be 
more pronounced on large files vs your average server but I’m just thinking out 
loud.

Anyone seen a recommendation or actually tested themselves?



_______________________________________________________

Barclays
www.barclaycardus.com
_______________________________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or 
proprietary information. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity who is the intended recipient. Unauthorized use of this information is 
prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by 
replying to this message and delete this material from any system it may be on. 
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu






Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

 Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Reply via email to