On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Powick wrote: > > On Dec 21, 10:45 am, Matt Robenolt <youdontevenk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> A simple, but overlooked feature I believe is a method to update all >> repositories at once. I tend to have no less than 10 working copies >> of various project we are working on. > > How could such an update represent a logical set of changes? What > would be your comment/commit message? Working this way is using SVN > as a quasi-backup system, which is not really its purpose. > > Commits should represent a logical set of changes, usually related to > a bug fix or feature implementation. Otherwise, you're just > cluttering up your repos with versions that are essentially useless, > because all they represent is a point in time where you felt like > backing up everything. If everyone on your team uses SVN as a backup > mechanism, your repos must be very difficult to work with.
He said Updates not Commits. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
