I found it to be rather slow though. Not only merging but the application in general. Though that might be due to the size of the repo I tested it with.
Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 18, 12:31 am, Cue <qbiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. Cornerstone's merge methodology works well in at least the basic > way. I haven't yet had the unfortunate experience of having to merge heavy > conflicts so I cannot speculate to that extent. But it does the job, and if > Versions incorporated such a feature I may just hang on to it > > Cue > > On 17 Nov 2010, at 20:28, Rob Rye <rowen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 13, 2010, at 2:24 AM, Chris Muktar wrote: > > >> No GUI app supports > >> this very well, but it would be the killer feature of Versions if it > >> did- even cornerstone doesn't have that. As teams grow, using merge > >> becomes ESSENTIAL and there needs to be a GUI for doing it (even if > >> it's just basic merge operations) as doing it on the command line is > >> hairy. > > > What is wrong with Cornerstone's support of merge? It seems to be quite > > effective to me. > > > Rob > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Versions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
