Billy Biggs wrote: > I think you're right though. Instead of doing a libv4l that nobody >would use, we should work on having lots of libs with inconsistent >interfaces, but at least the code would be shared. >
How about a minimal libv4l with a consistent interface for the other libraries to "plug in" to? That way, libv4l would provide a standard mechanism without enforcing the "policy" of a particular deinterlacer, scaler, etc... -- Mark McClelland [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Video4linux-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
