Kyle,
When you say you are a "High Def videoblogger", do you mean that you
are broadcasting movies that are 1080i or 720p (ie: either 1920x1080
pixels or 720x480 pixels)?? I'm fascinated with the way this term,
"high-definition" is getting used (well, or mis-used)... I keep hearing
a radio station in Philadelphia brag about how they are broadcasting in
"High-Definition radio" and I see these Kodak disposable "HD"
still-cameras in the drug stores, and I have no idea what either one of
those things is supposed to mean. (Well, other than misleading the
public by using a term most people don't understand technically and
sounding really cool as a marketing ploy. I get that -- but are those
companies really that willing to lie?)

Technically, if you've shrunk your video down to anything less than
720x480 progressive scan or 1920x1080 interlaced, then it's not HD. If
it is that big, then what happens to people with screens that are
smaller than that? (I can't watch your videos, cause I don't have QT7,
and my 2003 computer isn't fast enough anyway).

And I don't mean to be picking you Kyle -- I truly am fascinated with
how the words "high-definition" are getting used, and what they mean to
people.

jen



On Aug 18, 2005, at 4:40 PM, kylefasanella wrote:

> Hey guys I have my newest High definition video blog relesed.
>
> http://vilekylefasanella.blogspot.com/
>
> does anyone know if I am the first High definition video blogger or
> not?
>
> PS make sure you have quicktime 7 for the footage! and a decent
> computer doesn't hurt.



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to