Is this the MySpace Film landing site?:

http://music.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=film
http://tinyurl.com/lhfdu

   -- Enric
   -======-
   http://www.cirne.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "filmmaker_lynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> aaaaaargh!!! The myspace film side of myspace isn't geared towards
> teenagers. It is geared towards indie filmmakers/festival promoters
> etc. It is a different side to the site. 
> 
> Lynn Lane
> Coal River Pictures
> www.CoalRiverPictures
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> vlog: 
> "Docmaker on the Go"
> www.docmaker.blogspot.com
> 
> myspace:
> myspace.com/lynnlane
> 
> coming soon:
> vlogumentarian.com
> 
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
> <andrew@> wrote:
> >
> > Another important consideration that people often overlook is that  
> > these young teenagers will soon be the leaders of the world. Very
soon.
> > 
> > 
> > On Feb 26, 2006, at 5:06 AM, Frank Carver wrote:
> > 
> > > Sunday, February 26, 2006, 2:39:39 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
> > >> but for whatever reason, MySpace still seems like a dead end.
> > >> doesn't seem like it will last.
> > >> I like to think that media we create will last...so it means  
> > >> something
> > >> in the future.
> > >> I wonder if MySpace has that kind of longevity.
> > >> http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=1650209&page=1
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, longevity is not the point. Longevity is the kind of
> > > thing that concerns the middle-aged rather than the teenagers
who form
> > > the backbone of a service like MySpace.
> > >
> > > Most children and young people live in a kind of eternal now,
where it
> > > is assumed that things will be like "this" forever. It's not usually
> > > until a little later in life, when you have experienced change, felt
> > > loss and begun to ask yourself the definitive adult question "should
> > > we have children yet?" that longevity becomes a driving force.
> > >
> > > As a real example of this, one of my college students (aged
around 17)
> > > while talking about styles of clothing, casually expressed that, in
> > > comparison to fashions from the past (say the 1980s and 1990s),
> > > today's fashions would probably last forever. When I probed a bit
> > > deeper, the explanation was that today's styles are ordinary,
> > > whereas the others were just wierd.
> > >
> > > This attitude, that the the strangeness and change was all in
the past
> > > and things will just remain as they are from now on, goes a long way
> > > in trying to understand both the success of observably transient
> > > phenomena such as MySpace, and failure of the many attempts to
> > > interest young people in politics.
> > >
> > > Keeping people in this passive, unquestioning, state is good
news for
> > > advertisers and governments, so many cultures have developed
elaborate
> > > ways of delaying the onset of adult responsibility.
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Frank Carver   http://www.makevideo.org.uk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to