Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical

[Charles HOPE]

Legal loophole: can a work have two licenses simultaneously? Andreas Haugstrup wrote: What part of "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you *may* distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)? And from the legal code: "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Japan)." It is quite clear. If you use materiale from a Share-Alike work (apart from Fair Use), you *must* release your work under the exact same license. I've been telling you it's stupid, but that's how it is. - Andreas SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.