Seems okay on the surface but celebrities or wannabee celebrities don't really need or want our help. I don't need 17 shots of anybody else that forgot their knickers.
I'd like the team approach to how does your city handle recycling or where do people go for a good time that doesn't involve drinking and drugging. Now if famous means folks in your area and you want to show what they do then heck yeah. There are so many stories to be told it makes me sigh for not being able to get to them all. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Zack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > It occurs to me that if regular people with video cameras > were able to meet up together and collectively interview > people, for instance famous people, the result could be > interesting, for several reasons: > > (A) A group could probably ask more interesting questions > of interviewees than an individual interviewer could. > > (B) If it's not staged in some way, regular people always > have more off the wall questions than MSM people do. > > (C) The larger the group of interviewers, perhaps the > more willing some important people would be to be > interviewed, especially "man of the people" types. > > However there is also big risk: You know how everyone > hates the White House Press Corps, because all they do > is pose easy, softball questions to Bush and pals. Everyone senses > it's staged. The risk would be that bloggers would do the same, > or that the mainstream media would imitate them and stage > fake populist interviews. Or the MSM could try to discredit > the idea by staging especially unruly or disrespect-filled > interviews. > > Zack >
