got it, thanks! On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
> It seems that he's saying that files that are too big are downsized... > not files that are 320x240 will be translated to a larger size. All > you would have to do is submit your thumbnails at your desired size. > > -- > Bill C. > http://ReelSolid.TV > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Sounds big, but that's just me. >> >> I'd like 320x240 since I have a narrow main column. >> >> Can this be an option for people? >> >> On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Mike Hudack wrote: >> >>> The code itself is working okay, but it looks like our configuration >>> settings could use some tweaks. How does 640 x 480 sound as a >>> new max >>> size / resize target? >> >> -- >> Steve Garfield >> http://SteveGarfield.com >> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- Steve Garfield http://SteveGarfield.com
