--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Advertising is flawed by definition, corrupt in its basic premise, a premise > that in a pinch, excludes truth. > > One cannot accept money toward one's survival and in the pinch - when it > really matters - tell the sad truth about the advertiser.
That's an interesting philosophical way to think about it, making the choice between getting the money from a product you don't believe in and speaking out authentically against something you think is wrong or incorrect. Of course, that's a major consideration for news channels in how they report things and what they report... which corporation is paying for them to have equipment, electricity and jobs. You get paid to support their agenda instead of to stand up for your own line of reasoning or what you think is right. > It's all fine and dandy until the advertiser screws up. Screwups are > inevitable. Behind every advertiser are fallible humans. > > Humans will lie to survive. > > That's a dilemma. > > How do we pry ourselves off the dilemma's horns? Hmmm? > > By committing to tell the truth at the risk of losing the advertising > client. > > By choosing clients carefully. Which, of course, is impossible when your ad is automatically generated. > Advertising reeks with lies. I challenge you to watch an evening's worth of > television with a "lie filter" in your brain. Some lies are mere hyperbole; > others, flat-out insulting with untruth. > > As a result of the ubiquitous lie, we are inured to them. A dangerous > mindspace in which to live. > > Trusted filters. Social currency. That's my answer. > > Jan The whole question of WHY someone puts videos on the internet is worth exploring. Is it done for money? Internet fame? Self-expression? Public service? Speaking to the ten or entertaining the hundreds of thousands? Monetizing videos can lead to the shift of focus from creating the content to getting paid for it. Making videos to reach the desired demographic instead of videos you'd make if money wasn't an issue. The whole point of advertising is to get your money before you give it to someone else. :) No room for the truth in there! :D -- Bill C. http://ReelSolid.TV > On 3/3/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Generally, I have to agree with Bill here. > > > > On the web, there are many ways to use ads with video. I think it remains > > to be seen which will be the most well received approach, again generally > > speaking. Enric is likely correct in pointing out that mid-roll ads will > > not prove to be popular when done in such an intrusive manner as google > > video had been doing (or still is?). I think we might see more subtle > > in-play ads that do not interrupt the video but do take presence somewhere > > within the region or stage or the video.... and the player wrapper of the > > video. In particular, I believe that fullscreen modes will introduce > > additional opportunities, and real estate obviously, for ad > > placements. So > > where you might not experience in ad in default view, you would see ads > > when > > in fullscreen. Just theorizing really. But yes, the ads should be able > > to > > follow the video around as well.... but I think management of ad campaigns > > using new technologies will cover that. What I mean is..... ad > > implementation for web video playback and ad implementation of device > > video > > playback can utilize different injectable assets for different > > distribution > > channels that can be managed and manipulated by content owners and > > agencies. So I dont thnk an ad must follow a specific video but rather > > understanding that different videos will be distributed out and each can > > utilize different approaches and technologies to penetrate and disperse. > > > > Somone asked about Joost... > > I'm firing up Joost now to remind myself how ads, if any, are > > handled...... > > aye. looks like i need to download latest mac version. they need to add > > auto-updates already! > > cool, i have 2 invites to send out. email me off-list if you need em. > > Ok, Joost has ad bumps in between some videos... sponsors. they are quick > > "bumps". > > I suppose longer ads exist too. So it's like TV. Which makes sense since > > Joost is TV as VOD. > > > > Yeah... ads. yeah. > > > > whats a vlog? > > > > sull > > > > > > > > On 3/2/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "Heath" <heathparks@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry I have to disagree with you Ads placed around the video I think > > > > is more distracting than a preroll or post roll....why would I watch > > > > a video 16X9 and in the "black bar" areas there is a bunch of ads > > > > placed there? I know I woundn't. > > > > > > > > Or course I don't think advertising is "evil" like a lot of people > > > > either. But that is another conversation... > > > > > > > > Heath > > > > http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I posted this to Enric's page, but for some reason, it didn't go > > through: > > > > > > There are quite a few reasons why advertisements need to be _inside_ > > > videos. This assumes, as Chris pointed out, that the content creator > > > desires to make money with his/her video. This is the same > > > conversation as "how do we make sure that people see (and/or respect) > > > our CC licenses?". > > > > > > If the advertisement isn't inside the video, then, as you mentioned, > > > as soon as the video is watched out of context, the ad's no longer on > > > it. The purpose is defeated, because there is ZERO chance that > > > someone will click on an ad they never see. As far as advertisements > > > that run alongside or above or below a video, that assumes that > > > someone's willing to accept this visual intrusion while they're trying > > > to watch the video. Personally, if there's more stuff moving, that > > > wrecks my immersion in the piece. I'm actually less likely to watch a > > > video with ads constantly changing somewhere near it on the page than > > > I am likely to watch a video where I know there's going to be a pre, > > > post or midroll ad. > > > > > > The important questions are how to make the ads relevant to the > > > content, and as you brought up, the MOOD of the video, and how to make > > > the ads a seamless part of the video to the point that they're not > > > seen as an annoyance. > > > > > > Originally, I had ads running on my videos, but having looked at the > > > stats, it wasn't likely that someone was going to click on the ads > > > anyway. They were eyesores, and way more trouble than they were > > > worth. It would be different if I were making viral videos and > > > rolling the dice, hoping that hundreds of thousands of people would > > > watch the video, and I might get some clicks because of the numbers > > > game. As it stands, I don't have enough traffic to justify having > > > random, irrelevant, horrible-looking ads at the ends of my videos, so > > > they're gone. > > > > > > The key to all of this is having the ability to create your own ads > > > and change them as your sponsors change. There's interesting stuff > > > going on with this right now with "Wreck & Salvage", Galacticast and > > > blip.tv when they decide to roll out ads that you can modify and sell > > > on your own. Getting someone to sponsor you and making relevant and > > > useful ads for them as part of their sponsorship money is the way to > > > go. It's definite revenue, definite relevance and you're definitely > > > advertising someone you WANT to advertise or a product you want to > > > advertise instead of being victimized by the luck of the draw. > > > > > > -- > > > Bill C. > > > http://ReelSolid.TV > > > > > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "Enric" <enric@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've put up a post on my Lucid Media blog that may be of interest > > > > > here. It is the rational for not placing ads within videos: > > > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/37s2ma > > > > > or > > > > > http://lucidmedia.cirne.com/index.php/2007/03/02/the-case-against- > > > > advertising-in-net-video/ > > > > > > > > > > Blog text follows: > > > > > ================== > > > > > Recently methods of advertising in video have become active in > > > > > development and implementation. Originally when I heard the rational > > > > > for Ads in net videos from Revver, I thought it worthwhile. Provide > > > > a > > > > > method for people making video on the net to gain revenue from their > > > > > work. This would support net videomakers continuing their work. > > > > There > > > > > had been entries on the yahoo videoblogging group and on blogs for > > > > Ads > > > > > targeted to the audience and content of the video. Similar to Google > > > > > showing Ads that try to relate to keyword searches; an Ad for Harley > > > > > motorcycles could appear on a videoblog entry about a weekend > > > > > motorcycle hog excursion with friends. > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, specifying include an Ad in my video on Revver, > > > > blip.tv > > > > > and others means you can have a powerful, emotive video on the > > > > > relationship to one's father followed by a upbeat commercial for > > > > Juicy > > > > > Fruit gum. Or a irreverent video of doing a prank on someone > > > > followed > > > > > by a commercial for the Heart Association. Now this problem probably > > > > > just relates to the technicality of specifying categories for the > > > > Ad's > > > > > relationships to video content and the amount of different Ads > > > > > available. With time the correlation of Ads to video content and the > > > > > viewership should have stronger matching. > > > > > > > > > > The question is why have Ads in videos on distributed networks. > > > > > Traditionally, on a television set broadcast a advertisement had to > > > > > exist within the video stream. No other location was provided for > > > > > placement. However on the internet an Ad does not need to be in the > > > > > video. It can be anywhere around the video on the web page. Either > > > > > top, left, right, bottom or lower down the page. Now video on the > > > > net > > > > > does not mean just a web page. It can be an iPod, mobile phone, > > > > Tivo, > > > > > or even projected in a theatre film festival. All of these non- > > > > website > > > > > screens can and probably will develop methods of displaying more > > > > than > > > > > just a video stream. A future iPod, mobile phone, digital TV and > > > > > theatre projector will be able to show more than just the video. > > > > Like > > > > > the Opera super- and sub-titles projected separately from the > > > > > performance, these screens will probably eventually have dynamic > > > > > separate information areas where Ads can appear. Further with the > > > > > usage of different screen ratios than 4x3 (16x9, etc.), space can be > > > > > made available around the video to place Ads. This puts advertising > > > > in > > > > > the video stream, but does not directly break up the video > > > > continuity. > > > > > > > > > > Google proved the failure of putting ads directly in searches. Flash > > > > > Ads that pop-up and dance up over the content of web-pages send > > > > people > > > > > away from sites. And Ads that interrupt the video, even at the end, > > > > > will be found to be ineffective. They will either drive people away > > > > > from watching the videos if at the start or middle or tend to not be > > > > > watched if at the end. Ads placed around the video will work since > > > > > people can choose to pay attention to the periphery of a video if > > > > the > > > > > ad relates to their interest or ignore that area. > > > > > ================== > > > > > > > > > > -- Enric > > > > > -======- > > > > > http://www.cirne.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sull > > http://vlogdir.com (a project) > > http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) > > http://interdigitate.com (otherly) > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Faux Press - better than real > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
