Jay,

TheUptake's citizen J's will be be representing at the GOP convention. We are 
living on 
their doorstep.

David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >  I wanted to let you all know that the application process for getting
> >  your blog/ videoblog credentialed for the 2008 Democratic National
> >  Convention is now open. In 2004, the Democratic National Convention
> >  credentialed 30 blogs for the Convention. In 2008, we're going to be
> >  credentialing many more in 2008 in Denver, Colorado. I'll spare the
> >  details here, but we're credentialing 56 state bloggers/videobloggers
> >  for what is being called the State Blogger Corp. We're going to
> >  credential one blogger per state, DC and the territories. Then we
> >  have a general blogger pool where bloggers can apply for credentials.
> >  Check out this link for the Q and A. http://
> >  demconvention.wordpress.com/blogger-credentaling-process/
> 
> Jason, thanks for posting this.
> I followed up with him to make it more clear.
> 
> Bloggers should fill out this application for credentials to the Democratic
> National Convention:
> http://www.demconvention.com/a/2007/12/dncc_press_gall.html
> Be aware of these qualifications:
> 
>    - Blogs applying for the DemConvention State Blogger Corps must have
>    been in existence for at least six months and have at least 120 political
>    posts.
>    - You will be required to provide objective data that demonstrates
>    your circulation, reach, and frequency. Blogs should provide their 
> authority
>    from Technorati.com.
> 
> How many people here do a specifically political videoblog?
> I can only think of Chuck and David Howell at the Uptake.
> 
> I'd love to see someone at the Republican National Convention.
> 
> Jay
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://jaydedman.com
> 917 371 6790
> Video: http://ryanishungry.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
> RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



Reply via email to