> They don't have to, but they do most of the time in the name of rear-end > coverage. You do have a recourse to fight a takedown in writing, and > challenging in writing typically causes the host to review the material > ... I used this once with YouTube to get the "Stormtroopers Gone Wild" > video restored when it was improperly taken down.
so if someone asks blip/youtube/etc to take down a video...they take it down. then I can say its fairuse, and they put it back up. Then its up to the other person to take me to court? I guess im trying to figure out how much interpretation all the players in this process have BEFORE it hts the courts. I feel we as creators and hosting services need to help define what is fair use. then stand up for it. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Video: http://ryanishungry.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
