One thing. When I said that some court somewhere ruled that cable/dsl were
not subject to common carrier rules, the truth is the FCC made that ruling,
not any court.

... richard

On Feb 13, 2008 12:54 PM, Richard H. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Pat,
>
> I believe you're absolutely correct that the networks are going to need to
> be "smart" and take into account different data types and route/shape
> accordingly for the networks to be efficient. Net neutrality as originally
> conceived in the Markey amendment allowed for that.
>
> Here's the deal/misunderstanding.
>
> According the the original Markey Bill (it's not clear yet what the new
> one specifies) networks CAN discriminate based on data type - so ISPs can
> totally manage traffic by taking into account the nature of the data type -
> they could NOT discriminate based on data origination (they could not, for
> example, give more bandwidth within the network to CBS vs me).
>
> About network neutrality and competition. First, of course, if everyone
> has a fair playing field within the network (like a phone call from me to
> you, gets the same priority as a phone call from one AT&T executive to
> another), then competition will be increased, sine it allows innovators and
> start ups with lots of ideas and little money to compete and, in fact, we've
> seen this a lot already afforded by the web. Second, competition was
> SEVERELY curtailed when some court somewhere ruled that cable, and then dsl
> companies do not have to abide by common carriage laws when it comes to the
> internet. So, with phone lines, the companies who built the lines have to
> share the lines with other phone companies (they get a lot of tax breaks for
> building them and they are the default carrier, so it's still a good deal
> for them). Makes sense, of course, since we don't want every phone company
> building lines through public right aways and such. However, the internet
> with cable and dsl is not treated that way. This is why you only have one
> choice of ISP if you use one company's dsl lines, and same with cable.
> Remember with dial up when you could use different ISPs? Very very
> non-competitive, and surely one reason why there is so little build out of
> high speed lines in the US compared to other first-world countries - no
> motivation to do so, when you have a service monopoly on the lines already
> built.
>
> ... just explaining what may be some misunderstanding about what "network
> neutrality" is, and why it came into being ... Richard
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >   Internet traffic has double in the last two years and bandwidth usage
> > has increased by 40% each year.
> >
> > Why allow companies to charge for usage, manage traffic, and invest in
> > new technology when you can kill competition and force the entire
> > internet to slow down because of 5% of users? The creator of
> > BitTorrent is even opposed to net neutrality.
> >
> > This article does a good job of highlighting the problems ISPs are
> > facing as bandwidth use increases. No one here seems to be able to
> > offer a solution to these issues.
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2008 11:49 AM, Tim Street <[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]<tim%40frenchmaidtv.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry about that.
> > >
> > > Try this one: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120286741569864053.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim Street
> > > Creator/Executive Producer
> > > French Maid TV
> > > Subscribe for FREE @
> > > http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes
> > > MyBlog
> > > http://1timstreet.com
> > >
> > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 8:43 AM, David Meade wrote:
> > >
> > > > that url doesnt work for me.
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 13, 2008 11:39 AM, Tim Street <[EMAIL 
> > > > PROTECTED]<tim%40frenchmaidtv.com>>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Officials Step Up Net-Neutrality Efforts
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's an update from the Wall Street Journal
> > > > >
> > > > > http://tinyurl.com/3dzjbr
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim Street
> > > > > Creator/Executive Producer
> > > > > French Maid TV
> > > > > Subscribe for FREE @
> > > > > http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes
> > > > > MyBlog
> > > > > http://1timstreet.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://www.DavidMeade.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >  
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Richard
> http://richardhhall.org
> Shows
> http://richardshow.org
> http://inspiredhealing.tv
>



-- 
Richard
http://richardhhall.org
Shows
http://richardshow.org
http://inspiredhealing.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to