Does this mean that he now has to give up all sensitivity and common human decency, and retire every evening after work to a sports bar so that he can bemoan the destruction of journalistic traditions by opinionated amateurs in their bedrooms and laugh at the idea of one of them spending seven months in jail on a matter of principle, while getting quietly drunk to blot out both the amoral horror of his job and the dull aching fear that his job soon won't exist, for reasons he can't quite grasp?
No, I didn't think so. Glad he's got a good paying gig - that's cool. On 22-Aug-08, at 10:25 PM, Adam Quirk wrote: According to this article, getting a job at a newspaper made him a real journalist. Unless I'm interpreting this completely wrong. On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Irina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (from romenensko) Video blogger Wolf now a "real journalist" at a daily > paper ( > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/20/ MNRN129KU4.DTL > ) > San Francisco Chronicle > Josh Wolf , who spent 226 days in prison for refusing to testify ( > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/02/ MNGNSK9MJ71.DTL > ) > before a grand jury and turn over a videotape of a 2005 anarchist > demonstration, is now a general assignment reporter for the Palo Alto Daily > Post. "If the haters who said I wasn't a real journalist, are still > lurking," Wolf wrote on his blog, "I hope you don't have too much > indigestion after eating your words." > > -- > http://geekentertainment.tv > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
