you have mv-embed (http://metavid.org/w/index.php/Mv_embed)
it can use the viddeo tag
<video src="mymovie.ogg">
or
Multiple source types
<video>
<source type="video/ogg" src="mymovie.ogg" />
<source type="video/x-flv" src="mymovie.flv" />
</video>
or
Multiple sources, Multiple timed text tracks and Simple remote Embedding
(http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/ROE)
<video roe="my_roe_file.xml">
it has subtitling support as seen at
http://metavid.org/w/extensions/MetavidWiki/skins/mv_embed/example_usage/sample_page.php
click the CC button
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan <sullele...@...> wrote:
>
<snip>
> sull
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Adrian Miles <adrian.mi...@...>wrote:
>
> > absolutely, it is a disaster otherwise. imagine a page where you want
> > several videos, they will all download, i only want one, why should I
> > pay (bandwidth *does* cost) for 5 when I only want ot see one, let
> > alone the impact this has on my cache, computer, home network, other
> > users, viewing stats, etc.
> >
> > one solution would be image that links to page with video that it just
> > excludes interesting possibilities with multiple videos, unless I'm
> > missing something.
> >
> > the argument I would use is simply sustainability, why serve a pile of
> > video that is unwanted? bandwidth waste is waste none the less.
> >
> >
> > On 19/03/2009, at 8:30 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
> >
> > > There is pretty intense debate right now how this should be handled.
> > > Should
> > > it be a user choice that he enables on his browser that would not
> > > download
> > > all videos?
> >
> > cheers
> > Adrian Miles
> > adrian.mi...@... <adrian.miles%40rmit.edu.au>
> > bachelor communication honours coordinator
> > vogmae.net.au
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
