Hi Jared, A few years, ago all of our media was interfiled with books (4 campuses, 16 thousand media items). We (other librarians and myself) were able to convince the admins that separate/divided circulating collections were better. Our data clearly suggest that a separated circulating collections for books and DVD's serve to enforce higher circulation. Currently, our media circs are almost 23% of our overall checkouts. When they interfiled they were as low as 15%.
Regarding the open versus closed question, whenever I'm challenged about our circulation policy for media (one week loans), I point out that our teaching faculty requests represent only about 40% of the requests that I get. The rest of the selections come from librarians and me. When we had closed stacks, selections that came from librarians almost never were used in the classroom or even viewed in the library. Now, if a teaching faculty requests an item, we inform that faculty member when the item has arrived, and tell them they must fill out a reserve form for the item to be put in closed stacks. A lot of the time, the faculty member doesn't fill out the form and the media goes into circulation. It's obviously not a perfect system, but we have a policy and a process to point to when faculty complain. And though we lose a lot of videos, for our student population (community college students), I feel that open stacks/one week loans more viably supports student access. Finally, simply on an anecdotal note, I found that open stacks encourage more film requests from the students. When I fulfill a faculty request, the response is usually, "Thanks." When I fulfill a student request, it's like, "You're amazing." I don't question my librarian self worth in moments like those:) Mary. Mary Hanlin Media Collection Development Librarian Tidewater Community College P: 757.822.2133 F: 757.822.2149 mhan...@tcc.edu From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Boling, Brian Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 4:24 PM To: 'videolib@lists.berkeley.edu' Subject: Re: [Videolib] Videos shelved separate or integrated into the stacks? We've fairly recently (in the last year) transitioned to an environment where we have an open stacks "Leisure Viewing Collection" of popular titles, as well as our historical closed stacks collection that contains such things as $300 documentaries and PAL-format Russian films with no subtitles. Both collections circulate to faculty, students, and staff. The Leisure Viewing Collection has proven to be extremely popular with students, who prefer browsing to the catalog, and we've witnessed surprising increases in our DVD circulation stats. In that way, I'd say it has been a great success. I'd have to agree with other respondents that it depends on a wide variety of factors what type of arrangement is going to be "best"? We wanted to answer patron calls for a browseable collection and were lucky enough to have a little space available to us. Other places won't have this luxury. Additional historical considerations may also make a different arrangement more workable. Brian Boling. From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu<mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu> [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu]<mailto:[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu]> On Behalf Of Seay, Jared Alexander Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:46 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu<mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu> Subject: [Videolib] Videos shelved separate or integrated into the stacks? Hello, I know this issue has been brought up on this list before, but the whole idea of videos in open stacks (integrated with the regular book collection) vs. a separate video collection (in open or closed stacks) is coming up at our library with a vengeance. I would like to get a test of the waters among those on this list about what your library does, does it work, and what would make it better. Certainly both horror stores as well as happy sunshine stores would be appreciated. For the record my situation is thus: We are the academic library for the College of Charleston (about 11,000 students). We have about 8000 videos (VHS and DVD) in our separate, closed stack collection. We only circulate to faculty (3 days). Reserve videos for faculty are at the circulation desk. Students must view videos in library only. To add to the complication, we recently concluded an agreement with our Student Government Association (SGA) to create an SGA funded collection of "popular" video titles that would be circulated (3 days) to students only. This collection would be located on shelves near the circulation desk near our browsing books. We are in the process of ordering titles now. What are your thoughts? Beyond what your library actually does, what do you (philosophically) THINK and FEEL is the "best" approach to making a Media Collection available to faculty and students? Is spreading the videos throughout the regular collection a good thing? Is a separate video collection a good thing? Many variables exist (open/closed stacks, partial integration, partial circulation etc.). 'll gladly allow myself to be directed to any good articles or links on the subject too. Thanks. Jared PS: I just found a good article from Library Trends (Winter 2010) on the subject (that I have not read yet): "Making the Most of Your Video Collection: Trends in Patron Access and Resource Sharing" by Barbara Bergman of Minnesota State University" Jared Alexander Seay Reference Librarian Head, Media Collections Addlestone Library College of Charleston Charleston SC 29424 Main Office: 843-953-1428 blogs.cofc.edu/seayj/<http://blogs.cofc.edu/seayj/> Media Collections: 843-953-8040 blogs.cofc.edu/media collections<http://blogs.cofc.edu/mediacollections/> Addlestone Report: blogs.cofc.edu/addlestonereport<http://blogs.cofc.edu/addlestonereport/> Reference Services: blogs.cofc.edu/refblog<http://blogs.cofc.edu/refblog/> ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any access, use, disclosure or distribution of this email message by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient (or an agent acting on an intended recipient's behalf), please contact the sender by reply email and immediately destroy all copies of the original message. Virus scanning is recommended on all email attachments.
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
