OK, but I can't find it now! Could you possibly send me the copy you
sent to Monica?
I particularly recall I was unconvinced by his explanation of the
length of the long basses which is, of course, central to the issue
being discussed of upper octave or lower octave for these strings.
Perhaps I missed something...
Martyn
--- On Thu, 23/7/09, Alexander Batov
<alexander.ba...@vihuelademano.com> wrote:
From: Alexander Batov <alexander.ba...@vihuelademano.com>
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitarre theorbe
To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Thursday, 23 July, 2009, 2:51 PM
You should read it again ;)
AB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <[2]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Alexander Batov"
<[3]alexander.ba...@vihuelademano.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:35 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitarre theorbe
>
>
> Yes I read Stewart Pollens' paper but am also pretty sure the Strad
> patterns give no information about the theorboed extension so the
c.
> 160cm for the open basses is Stewart Pollens' own guess (based, I'd
> suggest, on the octave low disposition of the basses and similar
> theorbo/archlute relationships currently being discussed rather
than
> the relatively shorter basses (c 90/100?).
>
> Mh.
To get on or off this list see list information at
[4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
3.
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=alexander.ba...@vihuelademano.com
4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
