Interesting...  To my unschooled ears, I didn't find anything
   objectionable in the "Foscarini".  I'll admit that I'm getting tired of
   the ciaconna rhythm and its ilk...  It's getting very popular I think
   because it's so approachable.  Sort of like los Tangos are popular in
   Flamenco because anybody can locate himself in that rhythm...  unlike
   Bularias, for example which are far more complex.  Likewise the
   ciaconna, where I can imagine hordes of listeners swaying along gently
   with the tiorbo player...  Very easy listening.
   But as to kitchen sinks and all...  Well, no doubt there was some sort
   of control over acceptable performances and arrangements of this
   music.  So a kitchen sink virtuoso might find it difficult to get a gig
   playing for the local nobility.  But I find it hard to accept that
   there were no impromptu sessions where players of any instrument handy
   (sink included) might join in to play along with some of the favorites,
   greatest hits, etc.  I think there *is* an urge to popularize early
   music these days.  Groups mount performances that they hope look and
   feel like these "popular" impromptu sessions they imagine.  That is one
   way to popularize the music...  recreate the music's popularity.  (Have
   I used that word root sufficiently?)
   The only evidence I can personally site for impromptu playing is
   this...
   I play a mandore.  As far as I know, there are two manuscripts for this
   instrument -- F. de Chancy, and Skene.  Yet there are records among
   luthiers and violeros showing htey made many, many examples of this
   instrument.  Who played it, and where?  What music was played on it?
   Surely, hundreds and hundreds of people didn't commission these
   instruments so they could play pieces from two manuscripts.  I can only
   believe that people worked out their old favorites in their spare
   time.  And I further conjecture that they joined in the fun when
   friends got together to play.  The playing of music was the only way
   you were going to hear it, after all.  And indeed, I have been
   fortunate enough to be included in some arrangements as a mandore
   player, although no such part was written.  Historically accurate?  Who
   knows.  Musically enjoyable?  For me it was.
   I'm sure there are other reasons to believe people joined together,
   with what instruments they had, to play a tune as best as they could.
   And so I've noticed that larger ensemble performances are ever more in
   vogue.  It doesn't bother me all that much.  I can still play solo
   music, I can still find smaller arrangements to listen to.  I just see
   a different angle on the music when I hear a larger ensemble.  But I am
   no kind of historian.  Maybe I'm an example of exactly why you don't
   like these sorts of arrangements.  But there it is...
   cud
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Monica Hall <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   To: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   Cc: Vihuelalist <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 7:00:18 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Foscarini on Radio 3
   Dear Martyn
   Yes - I agree with everything you say.  I haven't listened to the whole
   concert yet - I got as far as the "Foscarini" piece and gave up.  Maybe
   I
   will have time for the rest this weekend.
   I am quite often sent CDs to review of this early Italian repertoire
   and the
   unsuitabilty of the singers in general is a problem especially we are
   not
   encouraged to say what we think!
   I suppose the "tin-pan alley" approach is adopted to try and make the
   music
   appeal to a broader audience.  In the end musicians have to earn a
   living.
   Just performing the songs with a single plucked string accompaniment,
   which
   may have been the norm, is just not going to attract many to the cause.
   Regards
   Monica
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   To: "Stuart Walsh" <[2]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>; "Monica Hall"
   <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   Cc: "Vihuelalist" <[4]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 8:06 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Foscarini on Radio 3
   >
   >    Dear Monica,
   >
   >  I very much agree about Kozena's singing: there's a fashion for well
   >  known sopranos to try their hand at small scale 'early music' but
   few
   >  seem to be able to make the transition succesfully (somewhat like
   >  similar rather wincing attempts at Broadway musicals).
   >
   >  In addition to problems evident in her rendition of 'Si dolce
   >  tormento', what I found particularly disturbing was a frequent
   >  inability to get the pitch quite right - whether this was because
   she
   >  was trying to control her (pitch) vibrato or because she was unused
   to
   >  being accompanied by a relatively small band (with relatively soft
   >  instruments - bear in mind we're not hearing the performance but the
   >  performance tweaked by sound engineers so don't really know what the
   >  actual balance was). Perhaps she's happier with orchestral
   >  accompaniment - I understand her Handel and Gluck opera roles have
   gone
   >  down well in the past.
   >
   >  I ought to say this doesn't just apply to Kozena: I recently heard
   >  Blow's Venus and Adonis with Venus sung by the operatic soprano
   >  Rosemary Joshua which had similar pitching problems - not just me,
   >  acquintances also remarked on it. Presumably producers judge that
   the
   >  fame of the name will ensure recording sales.....
   >
   >  M
   >
   >  PS I also agree about the kitchen sink - but again I largely blame
   the
   >  producers and sound engineers who I suspect encourage bands in this
   >  manner of delivery, thinking it will be more 'exciting' and the
   novelty
   >  will thus generate more listening/sales.
   >
   >
   >
   >  --- On Thu, 26/8/10, Monica Hall <[5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
   >
   >    From: Monica Hall <[6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   >    Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Foscarini on Radio 3
   >    To: "Stuart Walsh" <[7]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
   >    Cc: "Vihuelalist" <[8]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >    Date: Thursday, 26 August, 2010, 19:42
   >
   >  Thank you for that!    I was listening to the concert on the Radio 3
   >  website but I couldn't recognise it at all.  It sounded a bit like
   >  Piccinini's Chiaccona Cappona alla vera Spagnola.  Maybe it's just
   >  something they have made up themselves and attributed to
   >  Foscarini.  His book does include a different Chiaccona of
   >  Piccinini's.
   >  I dont really like these arrangements with everything but the
   kitchen
   >  sink in them.  That's one of the few things I agree with Lex about.
   >  Baroque guitar music is meant to be played on the baroque guitar. I
   >  didn't particularly like Magdalena Kozuna's singing  either - what I
   >  heard of it. I think she completely spoiled Monteverdi's Si dolce
   >  tormento.
   >  Maybe I will find time to listen to the rest of the concert before
   they
   >  wipe it off.  Meanwhile - leave it on you website.  If I listen to
   it
   >  a few more times I might trace it.
   >  Cheers
   >  Monica
   >  --- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Walsh"
   >  <[1][9]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
   >  To: "Vihuelalist" <[2][10]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:41 PM
   >  Subject: [VIHUELA] Foscarini on Radio 3
   >  >
   >  > The whole concert by Private Musicke (and brief description of it)
   >  can be heard here.
   >  >
   >  > The songs and pieces were played uninterrupted in each half. This,
   >  presumably, is the Foscarini:
   >  >
   >  > [3][11]http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Ff.mp3
   >  >
   >  >
   >  > Stuart
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >
   >  > To get on or off this list see list information at
   >  > [4][12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >  --
   >
   > References
   >
   >  1.
   [13]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   >  2.
   [14]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
   >  3. [15]http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Ff.mp3
   >  4. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   3. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   4. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   6. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   7. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   8. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   9. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  10. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Ff.mp3
  12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  13. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  14. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  15. http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Ff.mp3
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to