Being a robot and lacking a friendly, smiling face, I am very grateful for
the impersonal nature of e-mail.  (Just kidding.  ...kinda.)

Eugene


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
> Behalf Of Stewart McCoy
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 1:33 PM
> To: Vihuela List
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Protocol of emails (again...)
> 
> Dear Monica,
> 
> Many thanks for your single message. Much appreciated. :-)
> 
> I think it's fair enough to discuss how we send messages to each other,
> but Heaven forbid that any arbitrary protocol should be imposed. If
> anything is seriously amiss, Wayne will intervene, but otherwise we are
> free to do things as we think best.
> 
> One thing which does worry me about emails is their impersonal nature.
> We cannot see the sender's friendly, smiling face, so it is easy to take
> something amiss, especially when many of us have never met face to face.
> 
> The lists at Dartmouth College are a wonderful resource, and I am
> grateful to Wayne for organising them.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Stewart.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
> Behalf Of Monica Hall
> Sent: 20 December 2011 17:35
> To: Vihuelalist
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Protocol of emails (again...)
> 
> Sorry Stewart - there is no way that everyone is going to be happy
> whatever
> we might decide to do (and who is going to police it anyway?)   I
> personally
> have no problem at all with the fact that I receive the messages twice -
> or
> indeed with the fact that I receive my own messages back straight away.
> 
> I think you have to accept that if you are on the list everyone is going
> to
> do exactly as they please and there is nothing you can do about it -
> except
> not be on the list.
> 
> As far as tidying the heading is concerned I understand that [VIHUELA]
> is
> inserted automatically.  As for capital letters - well we all make
> typing
> mistakes and sometimes it is helpful to use them to emphasise something.
> 
> I think it is pretty clear from all the messages so far that we would
> each
> like to impose our own protocol on everyone else.  But in a free world
> that's just not going to happen.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Monica (who in this instance has sent the message only to the list and
> has
> tidied the heading to see what may come back when she presses send).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Reply via email to