It is on p.2 at the end of the third stave.
Whilst you are looking at the book could you also look at the following
piece on p.3, the last stave. You will see that the same phrase occurs
twice. Matteis has indicated that the 4th and 5th courses are to be
omitted the first time (in the first full bar) with dots, but the
second time (bar 5) there are no dots!
Monica
----- Original Message -----
From: [1]Martyn Hodgson
To: [2]Monica Hall
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Matteis
Page no in 1682 original plse
M
__________________________________________________________________
From: Monica Hall <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
To: Vihuelalist <[4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2013, 15:34
Subject: [VIHUELA] Matteis
On p.260 of his dissertation Alex Dean has reproduced two passages
from
Matteis's "False consonances".
In his transcription of the excerpt at the top of the page Dean
proposes that the open 1st and 5th courses should be included in
all the chords in the 2nd and 3rd bars.
Although Matteis does put dots on the lines very frequently to
indicate
that courses should be omitted he has not done so here. However he
does not seem to me to be wholly consistent about putting in the
dots,
about putting in"a"s for open courses - or for that matter in
indicating whether 4 part chords should be strummed.
I wonder how many people on the list - who can be bothered to look at
it - would include the open course in this passage.
Perhaps we could have a vote on it!
As ever
Monica
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
[5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
2. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
3. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
4. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
