Bram Moolenaar wrote: >Thanks for making this patch. It looks useful. > >I think it would be good to add some error handling: what if the number >entered is out of range for the number of windows?
Giving out of range number to <C-w>w, vim shows no error and goes to the window that has the largest number. Same for <CR> in that patch. I think it's consistent. >One problem: when the count is not given it should still use ".cc" and >".ll" as before. Yes, the patch works that way. Regards, -- AOYAMA Shotaro mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
