Yakov Lerner wrote: > > > On 5/5/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA > > > > > > I compared runtime files form ftp [1] and from svn [2]. > > > Both vims are labeled vim71a. But many runtimes are different. > > > In svn, many files are labeled 2007. In ftp, they are 2006 versions. > > > Why this difference in runtimes ? > > > > > > Yakov > > > [1] ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/unix/vim-7.1a.tar.bz2 > > > [2] https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7 > > > > Do I need to hunt down the differences? Please give a specific example. > > What "label" are you talking about? > > At closer examination, differences turned out to be in $Id..$, $Revision..$ > $Date...$ lines only, except for one file which has read differences: > runtime/autoload/spellfile.vim -- see diffs below. > By "labels" I meant the cvs $Id...$ keywords and other $..$ keywords. > Full diffs are attached. Diffs are produced by the script diff-vim-ftp-svn.sh, > also attached.
Oh, the CVS version lines. I ignore them. In my opinion meta information should not be inside the file. The spellfile.vim script was changed by the one patch that went out for Vim 7.1a. Fixed a conflict with netrw changes that so far went unnoticed. So nothing to worry about. -- Ed's Radiator Shop: The Best Place in Town to Take a Leak. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
