> I like to keep the name in, so that when later changes > are suggested we know who wrote the original.
I don't mind that either :) >> after the pointer line. That way, the unused error >> text between doesn't break vim's notion of a >> "multi-line message" and also doesn't force us to >> include it as a "continuation of a multi-line >> message." > > Thanks for the update. Only the last two items changed, > right? Correct. (Erm, I must have thought I was about to make many more changes... sorry, the pedantry was unintentional.) :)
