Am Mittwoch, den 16.05.2007, 09:43 +0200 schrieb Zdenek Sekera: > - Tip2 template is seems fine to me. > - Who will or how it will be decided what are the different > 'complexity' (what terms will be allowed)?
I also vote for v2 (though i wrote v1 :-) ) And lets dont forget, that the layout of the template can be changed always at a later time. So its no problem if we use a suboptimal template for the beginning ... More important is that the fields keep consistent ... > - I find little inconvenient that when I want to add a comment > I can't have the original tip (and perhaps other comments) > in front of my eyes (maybe to scroll it manually) but that > may be unsolvable > - it could be useful to have a possibility to have a button > saying 'Add a new tip' on every tip page so when I want > to add a tip I don't have to start from a different page. > That, too, may not be possible, correct? There is already a "Add Tip" Button on http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/VimTest . If you try that out, you will find some instructions on the top. These are freely editable at http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/TipInstructions . When using this "AddTip" approach, people have to invent their own pagename. (autoincrementig the tip-id seems to be impossible) Therefore, I would vote for using tip-title == page-title and let the categorization be done by [[Category:VimTip]]. Using Wikipedia standards (CamelCaseIsUgly) we would get pages like "The Super Star" and we could reuse the title in the template. We would loose the tip-id for new tips. But that seems to be unavoidable. And what is the id good for anyways? Using a cron job to convert tips wont work, because we have no access to the host. Sebastian.
