Yakov Lerner wrote:
> On 8/28/07, *Yakov Lerner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/07, *Bram Moolenaar* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
> Yakov Lerner wrote:
>
> > I get weird up/down behaviour when cursor traverses the
> braces. vim 7.1.87,
> > no custom plugins. This is apparently somehow related to
> matchparen.
> >
> > The testfile is x.c below.
> > Here is what happens if I press down starting from the
> beginning of file,
> > position 1:
> >
> > 1. Down. instead of going to line 2, cursor shows at line 4 !!!
> > 2. Down. cursor is at line 3
> > 3. Down. cursor is at line 2 !!!
> > 4. Down. cursor is at line 5
> > 6. Up. Cursor is at line 2!!!
> > 7. Up. Cursor is at line 3.
> > 8. Up. Cursor is '}' line 4!!!
> > 9. Up. Cursor is at line 1.
> >
> > ----------- x.c ----------------
> > int foo()
> > {
> > return 0;
> > }
> > /* */
>
> I don't have a vt220 so I can't try it out. I wonder if you are
> actually using a vt220 anyway, these are quite rare these days...
>
>
> I observe same results when setting XTERM to xterm-mono.
> The terminal was actually xterm.
> You can change vt220 to xterm-mono and see the same results.
>
> > How can you tell where the cursor is and it's not the highlighting
> that
> > makes you think the cursor is somewhere else?
>
> I can do :echo line('.') col('.'). This shows me that cursor is not
> where vim shows the white block on the screen.
>
> > Try using a different color scheme.
>
> I normally work in color xterm. There is no problem there.
> I do not normally work in B/W term. What we were doing, we were
> checking how some console software (not vim) behaves under the
> black-and-white TERM.
>
> As a side effect, I noticed that matchparen behaves weirdly on B/W
> term. In the mentioned B/W setup, the colorscheme was default
> because .vimrc is empty.
>
> Anyway, if you want to see the matchparen problem on BW term (with
> default colorscheme), you can set TERM to xterm-mono and see for
> yousrself.
>
>
> Maybe the solution is that patchparen would turn itself off when the
> terminal is black and white.
> Even if matchparen gets fixed and shows exactly same blocks at two
> places -- at the cursor point and and at the matching parent point --
> this looks confusing.
>
> Yakov
Assuming that your cursor is normally a block, one of
:hi MatchParen term=underline
or
:hi MatchParen term=bold
should show its mate differently. (I thought of "term=blink" but apparently
Vim doesn't know about that.)
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Collaboration, n.:
A literary partnership based on the false assumption that the
other fellow can spell.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
