On 10/6/07, Matthew Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:22:53 +0200, "Yakov Lerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On 10/5/07, Matthew Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I've been working on an implementation of the non-uniform tabstops > > > that were discussed about a month ago, and I have a patch ready for > > > trying out. I've done some testing on Linux and Windows XP; the parts > > > I'm able to test seem to be OK and on Linux it survives "make test" > > > cleanly, but I need people to try it out on other systems and test > > > the parts I can't reach. > > > > > > With this patch the set tabstop, set softtabstop and retab commands > > > take a comma-separated list of tab widths (as in ":set ts=4,20,8" or > > > ":retab 20,4"). > > > > You changed the option type from numeric to string, right ? > > > > I believe this breaks some backward-compatibility: > > 1) The old code rightly expected &ts to be proper number and did > > arithmetics on it; this gets broken. > > 2) Also, if old code had things like 'set ts+=3', 'set ts-=3', it gets > > broken, too. > > Does anyone actually do that?
It's easy to find out. Just check every vim script in existance ;-) Yakov --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
