Nick Gravgaard schrieb:
>>>> And you cannot compare 2d- with 2dd, you have to compare it with 2d+.
>>> Sure, but 2dd is quicker to type than 2d+, and I'm not sure how many
>>> people really use 2d-.
>> I don't. I use 2dj and 2dk, not 2d+ and 2d-.
>
> Of course. I'll try training myself to use this instead.
>
> Before I do though, is there any way to script Vim so that dd (for
> instance) counts from zero?
:nnoremap <expr> dd v:count ? "dj" : "dd"
dd -> dd
1dd -> 1dj
2dd -> 2dj
" map more operators this way:
" :h operator
" maps "~" if 'tildeop' set
for opr in split("c d y g~ gu gU ! = gq gw g? > <lt> zf "." ~"[&top])
exec "nn <expr>" opr.opr "v:count ? '".opr."j' : '".opr.opr."'"
echo "nn <expr>" opr.opr "v:count ? '".opr."j' : '".opr.opr."'"
if strlen(opr) == 2
exec "nn <expr>" opr.opr[1] "v:count ? '".opr."j' : '".opr.opr."'"
echo "nn <expr>" opr.opr[1] "v:count ? '".opr."j' : '".opr.opr."'"
endif
endfor
unlet opr
" Side note:
" "zff" doesn't wait for a character, as long as there is no user omap
" for f{char}, like "ff", "fa", etc.
--
Andy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
