On 10/06/08 15:09, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
[...]
> Whereas, requiring a vim to include the interfaces to
> python/ruby/pick-your-poison ... well, now you're talking real bloat (as
> in increasing the vim executable size).
>
> Regards,
> Chip Campbell

Well, like you I think, I believe that vim-script is usually quite 
enough for most of the things one would want to do with Vim; but I have 
seen people who apparently cannot think of programming Vim in other than 
Perl or Python (etc.). As I think you know, for people who think of such 
interfaces as "useless bloat", they can be excluded bodily at 
compile-time, and compiling Vim is not really difficult. The only bloat 
then would be in sources which are left out of the executable, either 
because the modules in question are simply not compiled, or because, in 
included modules, the instructions in question are in the false branch 
of some #ifdef; and I believe that such "source-only bloat" can be 
tolerated.

Best regards,
Tony.
-- 
If you want your spouse to listen and pay strict attention to every
word you say, talk in your sleep.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui