On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >> >> On 26/06/08 22:18, Bram Moolenaar wrote: >>> >>> Patch 7.2a.001 >>> Problem: On some systems X11/Xlib.h exists (from X11-dev package) but >>> X11/Intrinsic.h does not (in Xt-dev package). This breaks the >>> build. Also, on Solaris 9 sys/ptem.h isn't found. >>> Solution: Have configure only accept X11 when X11/Intrinsic.h exists. >>> Check for sys/ptem.h while including sys/stream.h. (Vladimir >>> Marek) >>> Files: src/auto/configure, src/configure.in >> [...] >> >> And for those who, like me, are slow to readjust: the 7.2a patches >> directory is http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/patches/7.2a/ (of >> course it's accessible also by ftp). This means it's *not* a sibling of >> the 7.1 patches directory (it's in the "unstable" tree). > > Oh, boy. Is this 7.2a -> 7.2.0 transition going to break version sorting > again?
Is there any chance the beta versioning could be made so 7.2.000 will be "greater" on comparison? 7.2a.x is usually "newer" than 7.2.x. 7.2a.x is usually "newer" than 7.2.x. For example, you could make the version 7.1.999.x or something. Thanks. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
