On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

>
> On 29/06/08 00:03, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>>> On 26/06/08 22:18, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>>>> Patch 7.2a.001
>>>>> Problem:    On some systems X11/Xlib.h exists (from X11-dev package) but
>>>>>       X11/Intrinsic.h does not (in Xt-dev package).  This breaks the
>>>>>       build.  Also, on Solaris 9 sys/ptem.h isn't found.
>>>>> Solution:   Have configure only accept X11 when X11/Intrinsic.h exists.
>>>>>       Check for sys/ptem.h while including sys/stream.h. (Vladimir
>>>>>       Marek)
>>>>> Files:        src/auto/configure, src/configure.in
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> And for those who, like me, are slow to readjust: the 7.2a patches
>>>> directory is http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unstable/patches/7.2a/ (of
>>>> course it's accessible also by ftp). This means it's *not* a sibling of
>>>> the 7.1 patches directory (it's in the "unstable" tree).
>>> Oh, boy. Is this 7.2a ->  7.2.0 transition going to break version sorting
>>> again?
>>
>> Is there any chance the beta versioning could be made so 7.2.000 will be
>> "greater" on comparison? 7.2a.x is usually "newer" than 7.2.x. 7.2a.x is
>> usually "newer" than 7.2.x. For example, you could make the version
>> 7.1.999.x or something.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> No, in Bram's system anything with two letters (alpha) is before
> anything with one letter (beta) which is before anything with no letters
> (release). So in this case 7.2a.008 comes before 7.2.0. Similarly with
> Mozilla, (Firefox) 2.0.0.16pre is before 2.0.0.16 and (SeaMonkey)
> 2.0a1pre is before 2.0a1 which is before 2.0, in a manner which is just
> as contrary to strict lexicographical ordering.

That's why I'm asking Bram to change his ways. Just because Mozilla does
it "wrong" doesn't mean Bram has to.

-- 
Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui