On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Lee Naish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...]
This works fine :-) But I've been thinking and there is one thing that bothers me. With the original implementation, if the system ran out of memory in the middle of the join and couldn't allocate a new line with enough space for the resulting concatenation. Then the operation would be aborted but we still would had the first half of the lines beeing joined in one line. Whereas with this approach, the resulting file could be almost anything. I know this could never happen in practice. But, well, we never know. PS: Maybe I'm completly wrong about this. I'm just beginning to dive in vim's code so I could be missing something, but I'm eager to learn (: -- MatÃas Larre Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.larre-borges.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
