Ben Fritz, 18.12.2008: > > On Dec 18, 7:01 am, Markus Heidelberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Given that anything else in the HTML output (also the 'number' option) > > pretty much reflects the appearance of Vim's window, maybe the > > foldcolumn should also look the same as in Vim? > > That's what I was thinking. However, it would certainly be easier to > code (and potentially to interact with) if the foldcolumn width would > just grow to accommodate the highest fold level. What do people > think...should 'foldcolumn' be used for the width of the fold column, > complete with a duplication of Vim's foldcolumn text, or should it > just grow as needed?
I didn't yet consider this case for the appearance reflection, but the color and characters used. It should grow. We need to have every fold level on the fold column, else we can't solve the problem of "unknown" open folds. Maybe foldcolumn=foldlevel+1 to have one space between the column and the text. > > When typing ^Vu and the codes above in terminal Vim, I always get these > > squares, i.e. the characters cannot be displayed, in vim -g it works. Is > > this a font issue? > > Also, Konqueror displays the squares, but Firefox and Opera get it > > right. > > > > I think we should try to create a page that doesn't depend on the font > being used (beyond the fact that it should be fixed-width, of course). Yes, I also think so. Using '+' '-' '|' will work everywhere. Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
