Ben Fritz wrote:
> I just realize my patch doesn't handle the g:html_no_pre option. I'll > make another patch in the next day or two to also handle this option > (I notice I'll need to get the latest from FTP again). > > Bram, once I fix the handling of g:html_no_pre, is there a reason not > to include this in the official script? I haven't looked in detail at the changes yet. I'm first awaiting comments. If the change looks like it won't break anything when folding is off it should be OK to include. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 69. Yahoo welcomes you with your own start page /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
