On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Ben Fritz <fritzophre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just realize my patch doesn't handle the g:html_no_pre option. I'll > make another patch in the next day or two to also handle this option > (I notice I'll need to get the latest from FTP again). > > Bram, once I fix the handling of g:html_no_pre, is there a reason not > to include this in the official script?
New patches attached, based off the latest from FTP, and accounting for g:html_no_pre. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
2html.vim.diff
Description: Binary data
syntax.txt.diff
Description: Binary data