On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Ben Fritz <fritzophre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just realize my patch doesn't handle the g:html_no_pre option. I'll
> make another patch in the next day or two to also handle this option
> (I notice I'll need to get the latest from FTP again).
>
> Bram, once I fix the handling of g:html_no_pre, is there a reason not
> to include this in the official script?

New patches attached, based off the latest from FTP, and accounting
for g:html_no_pre.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Attachment: 2html.vim.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: syntax.txt.diff
Description: Binary data

Raspunde prin e-mail lui