sc, 2010-01-16: > On Saturday 16 January 2010 10:54:13 am Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > > vim_extended.git is based on vim_mainline so it will not be > > continued in the same way. One solution would be to use a > > tool like hg-to-git to import the official repo into a git > > branch, but I guess a better approach would be to stay close > > to upstream and use a hg repo for reduced trouble and > > increased compatibility. I haven't used hg except for pulling > > and updating by now and I guess I don't like it as much as > > git, but I think it would be the best solution. > > > so -- what -- those of us now hooked on relative numbers will use > hg to get vim mainline, then git to merge the r/n patches?
No, like I said, using two different VCSs is suboptimal, desired is to use hg for everything. A vim_extended hg repository could be set up. Markus
-- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
