Hi François!
On Fr, 01 Feb 2013, François Ingelrest wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > This looks like a good solution. I'll include it. With Christian's
> > addition.
>
> I think I found a case where the 'relativenumber' option is reset. I'm
> sending this report in this thread, although I don't know if it's
> caused by the recent changes to relativenumber:
>
> 1. vim -u NONE -U NONE
> 2. :set number
> 3. :set relativenumber
> 4: :e .zshrc
> 5: :e .zsh_history
>
> At step 4., relativenumber is on. At step 5., it's off. Not setting
> number (step 3.) before relativenumber doesn't exhibit this behavior.
>
> This is with Vim 7.3.798, features=big, on a Debian Squeeze.
Here is a patch.
regards,
Christian
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
diff --git a/src/option.c b/src/option.c
--- a/src/option.c
+++ b/src/option.c
@@ -7631,8 +7631,7 @@
#endif
/* 'list', 'number' */
- else if ((int *)varp == &curwin->w_p_list
- || (int *)varp == &curwin->w_p_nu
+ else if ((int *)varp == &curwin->w_p_nu
|| (int *)varp == &curwin->w_p_rnu)
{
/* If 'number' is set, reset 'relativenumber'. */
@@ -7641,6 +7640,9 @@
curwin->w_p_rnu = FALSE;
if ((int *)varp == &curwin->w_p_rnu && curwin->w_p_rnu)
curwin->w_p_nu = FALSE;
+ /* also reset the options for the all buffers in this window */
+ curwin->w_allbuf_opt.wo_nu = curwin->w_p_nu;
+ curwin->w_allbuf_opt.wo_rnu = curwin->w_p_rnu;
}
else if ((int *)varp == &curbuf->b_p_ro)
