Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi François! > > On Fr, 01 Feb 2013, François Ingelrest wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > This looks like a good solution. I'll include it. With Christian's > > > addition. > > > > I think I found a case where the 'relativenumber' option is reset. I'm > > sending this report in this thread, although I don't know if it's > > caused by the recent changes to relativenumber: > > > > 1. vim -u NONE -U NONE > > 2. :set number > > 3. :set relativenumber > > 4: :e .zshrc > > 5: :e .zsh_history > > > > At step 4., relativenumber is on. At step 5., it's off. Not setting > > number (step 3.) before relativenumber doesn't exhibit this behavior. > > > > This is with Vim 7.3.798, features=big, on a Debian Squeeze. > > Here is a patch.
Thanks. Looks a bit tricky, perhaps we should have a test for this? Won't be all that easy, I suppose. -- When I look deep into your eyes, I see JPEG artifacts. I can tell by the pixels that we're wrong for each other. (xkcd) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
