Axel Bender wrote:
> I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2.
> But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite
> noticeable, 13 to 20 secs that's a lot. I hope that Bram goes into
> that...
There are no changes to the old regexp engine that would make it slower.
Note that you need to set 'regexpengine' before opening a file, syntax
items are cached.
If you can reproduce slowness with 'regexpengine' set to 1, please let
us know how to reproduce that. Please make sure the context (esp. any
plugins, fold settings, etc.) are identical. Different runtime files
also matter a lot.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
57. You begin to wonder how on earth your service provider is allowed to call
200 hours per month "unlimited."
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
