Hi Mike! On So, 21 Jul 2013, Mike Williams wrote:
> On 20/07/2013 10:13, LCD 47 wrote: > > I believe this can be fixed with a counter that means something > >along the lines of: "this line is longer than &tw, and it has no > >breaking point for the first X characters". Then X would be updated > >every time more text is appended to that line. Are you going to create a patch for that? > Yup to all that. And there is another O(n^2) operation is getvcol() > rescanning the line after each insert. Not only that, but getvcol() is called twice from the edit() function. Once from validate_cursor_col() at line 695 and once from validate_cursor() at line 725. It seems like that either one of those calls could be saved. regards, Christian -- Wie man sein Kind nicht nennen sollte: Hans Dampf -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
