On Mi, 02 Apr 2014, Danek Duvall wrote: > I'm in the same boat. I've been using MQ for years and am comfortable with > it, and haven't had the time to try out obsolescence in any serious way, > though I'm actually quite excited about it, since I'd love to have the > history of my patch changes for the duration of the patch. I tried out > pbranch several years ago, but it was just too wild, and the merges were > horrendous.
Can someone explain in little more detail how to use the new recommended way to deal with patches if mq becomes un-supported? Thanks. Best, Christian -- Ein Schotte mit brennender Kerze vor dem Spiegel: Zweiter Advent. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
