On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:44 PM, James McCoy <james...@jamessan.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 2015 5:03 PM, "John Szakmeister" <j...@szakmeister.net> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:26 AM, James McCoy <james...@jamessan.com> > wrote: > > [snip] > > > $ git gc --aggressive > > > ... > > > $ du -hs .git . > > > 34M .git > > > 47M . > > > > Just wanted to point out that there's really no need for > > "--aggressive" here. "git gc" without it will often produce similar > > results in less time. :-) > > I initially ran just "git gc" and there was no change in disk space. I'm > using a new enough git that it periodically kicks off a background "git gc" > after a normal git command. Maybe clone is one those cases. > While "git gc" will *sometimes* produce similar results to "git gc --aggressive", it very, very often in my experience does not. This is perhaps one of those cases. -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
