> 1. are 1-wide > 2. the *font itself* is too wide. > > > So this problem has nothing to do with Vim. > > > To check whether it is the case, use terminal emulator which does not support > fallback fonts or does not do it by default. E.g. rxvt-unicode (AKA urxvt) > has this property (make sure that fallback font is not specified in X > resource database: urxvt does not support automatic fallback driven by > fontconfig configuration, but it has its own configuration with similar > purpose). If in such terminal emulator the glyph you are referring to is > shown as missing (usually as rectangle) and occupies exactly one display cell > then I am right. If it is not there are two variants: > > > 1. There is something wrong in the font. Never saw this variant actually. > 2. Your Vim is using outdated unicode databases. (Note: they were recently > updated to unicode-8.0.)
Actually on my system (FreeBSD, kde konsole terminal) font doesn't support this character, and it is shown as an "empty box" glyph. However, when the cursor is over it, one box turns into two consecutive boxes. And when the cursor is to the right, space gets added to this symbol and other letters begin to jump in a strange way. So I don't think font has anything to do with it. Also vim package doesn't depend on any unicode packages, last time I looked widths were hard-coded in vim itself. Yuri -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
