David Fishburn wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Patch 7.4.2231
> > Problem:    ":oldfiles" output is a very long list.
> > Solution:   Add a pattern argument. (Coot, closes #575)
> >
> >
> I was wondering if something similar to this could be added to the :let
> command (though it has a lot of permutations).
> 
> I can do the following:
>     :let g:
> 
> I would love to do the following:
>     :let g:loaded_db\w\+
> 
> And return only those matching variables.

Are we going to get this request for any command with a long output
list?

Perhaps we better add a generic way to filter the output.  Unfortunately
we can't use "command | grep /pattern/".  Not all commands accept
another command following.  We could put it in front:

        filter /pattern/ command

It's like a command modifier then.  But one with an argument.
Note that the filtering would happen line-by-line, thus if there is an
item that takes several lines only matching ones would show up.

-- 
Never go to the toilet in a paperless office.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui