On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 3:04:51 PM UTC-5, Andy Wokula wrote: > > I'd vote for [count]^ going to the [count]th character in the line. > (We can easily go to the [count]th screen column and to the [count]th > byte, but not yet to the [count]th character, unless I'm missing > something). >
While useful, "[count]th character" doesn't seem to fit well with "1st non-blank character" to me. Maybe "[count]th non-blank character" would make more sense but I'm not sure how useful that would be. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
