On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:17 AM, James McCoy <james...@jamessan.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:21:55PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote: [...] >> Not sure, why the vartabs enabled Vim is actually smaller then the >> unpatched Vim. That is certainly unexpected, I might have messed >> something up. Not sure, I really need to get some sleep now :( > > You just got the builds mixed up. :) > > 12264088 (+vartabs) is larger than 12234272 (-vartabs). The more > interesting figures (if size is really a factor) would be after > stripping both binaries, since that's what most people are likely to > encounter. > > Cheers, > -- > James
Ah, of course. Before stripping, the percentage difference is only (12264088 - 12234272) * 100 / 12234272.0 which is less than 0.25%. If the percentage difference after stripping is similar I would never call it code bloat. Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
