On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:55 AM, björn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/3 Ben Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> have separate MacVim builds for Tiger and Leopard. > > It seems this is the only way to go then. But...I wonder if it really > is worth my time making two distributions just so a few users get to > use Python 2.5 instead of 2.3. I think I need a better reason than > that for something as drastic as distributing two different versions > of the binary. Maybe I underestimate the number of users who would > benefit from 2.5, but for now I'll just keep building with 2.3. :-/
FWIW, I've been toying with the idea of making my own Leopard-only builds available recently. I always build my MacVim from source using Python 2.5 and 10.5 SDK. I do also use a couple of extra patches in my build (relative number, Lua, working on vimgdb). If there is interest, I could put my builds up somewhere for others to use. My main concern would be increasing the support load due to unofficial builds floating around. Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
