Nico Weber wrote: >>> It seems this is the only way to go then. But...I wonder if it >>> really >>> is worth my time making two distributions just so a few users get to >>> use Python 2.5 instead of 2.3. I think I need a better reason than >>> that for something as drastic as distributing two different versions >>> of the binary. Maybe I underestimate the number of users who would >>> benefit from 2.5, but for now I'll just keep building with 2.3. :-/ > > That sounds reasonable.
+1. Real Python-heads can always compile themselves. >> What about feature freezing the current 10.4 version and continuing >> development for 10.5 only? Then you could enable garbage collection >> which would be much more convenient for development -- this issue bugs >> me especially because if someone wants to make a plugin, I'm pretty >> sure they can't use garbage collection since MacVim doesn't. > > I don't use Tiger, but I don't think dropping Tiger already is a good > idea (see e.g. http://update.omnigroup.com/). I agree, but I do use Tiger. 10.4.9. :-) Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
