2008/11/21 Nico Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Nico, have you used icns browser to examine those icon files. You'll >>> find that they contain more than just a 512^2 icon or smaller. >> >> Yes, I'm aware of that. Preview also displays the several sizes. I'm >> currently cooking up a program to create document icons. > > The script is attached. I tested it with Preview's app icon and > compared it to the document icons bundled with Preview.app. It's close. > > To use this, drop the script into the directory containing > vim_gloss.icns and execute it in Terminal. It will create a file > called out.png. It's probably best to use a vim icon that doesn't have > any shadow for this script (Bjorn, do you have a version of the icon > without shadow?). I'm open for all kinds of comments. If there are > none, I'll use this to create icons for all filetypes supported by vim > tomorrow.
I don't have any other version of the icon at the moment, but I could get one. However, I strongly prefer file type icons that have the paper with one corner folded -- is there any way we could take a generic one of those and use your script to add the file extension on top? (I really dislike the current file type icons in MacVim.) As for the increased app bundle size: how do other text editors handle file type icons? Do they only use small-ish sized icons? Or do they simply not care about the bloat? Björn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
